Issues with your account? Bug us in the Discord!
Is that something shiny and new?
Sanfam
I like clocks.
in Zocalo v2.0
Yes! It is! Two things, actually. Though one isn't all too shiny.
See that icon in the top right? That's our fancy new spoiler button! Saves the hassle of typing things out and making it work after.
but wait, it mentions this thing called sp...
I got tired of writing it out, so instead of 'spoiler', the tag can now be summoned with a simple 'sp'. It also has been given the gift of parameters, making it possible to identify the context of the spoiler in question. Example, [sp=The Cake]Is a lie[/sp]. Or more usefully so, [sp=Revelations]Something epic happens in this battlestar galactica episode![/sp]. It can also be used without. [sp]Monkeys are rad![/sp]
I've also added proper speculation tags, which can be summoned through 'spec' and have the same parameters. It doesn't have a button, as I don't believe it has yet earned one, but if anyone needs it that much I can probably provide it. [spec=This thread]I think that about covers it.[/spec]
See that icon in the top right? That's our fancy new spoiler button! Saves the hassle of typing things out and making it work after.
but wait, it mentions this thing called sp...
I got tired of writing it out, so instead of 'spoiler', the tag can now be summoned with a simple 'sp'. It also has been given the gift of parameters, making it possible to identify the context of the spoiler in question. Example, [sp=The Cake]Is a lie[/sp]. Or more usefully so, [sp=Revelations]Something epic happens in this battlestar galactica episode![/sp]. It can also be used without. [sp]Monkeys are rad![/sp]
I've also added proper speculation tags, which can be summoned through 'spec' and have the same parameters. It doesn't have a button, as I don't believe it has yet earned one, but if anyone needs it that much I can probably provide it. [spec=This thread]I think that about covers it.[/spec]
Comments
Perhaps purple will get a tag of its own. ;)
Weve been trying to rectify that problem for years..
[spec]But I suspect that will be take care of, si?[/spec]
I don't see how to do the context though.
Its easy, yo!
I think I did it wrong :(
Also, could the green for spec-tags be a little brighter? It's a bit too similar to the tone of the red to be immediately recognized as different by the colorly-blinded.
[spec]I suspect this will be quite overused.[/spec]
ARGH!
[COLOR="DarkOrange"] or this? [/COLOR]
[U] Maybe this? perhaps this? [/U]
[B] Not this! [/B]
(spoiler inside) Spoiler: just because your paranoid doesn't mean everyone isn't out to get ... me?
The only icon up there is the #1 now # 27
Is this one of them there must be under 45 to be able to see its?
The lazy route, where I simply shortened the tags, is the one I think is probably the most effective. :p
And Chaosed, you still need to close the tags. Also, the "(spoiler)" (or the appropriate variation) is automatically appended when you encapsulate body text with the proper tags.
The icon itself is the right-most icon on the bottom row. it looks like an uppercase 'S' in moderate bold.