Issues with your account? Bug us in the Discord!

Toyota now overtakes GM

croxiscroxis I am the walrus
[url]http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6586679.stm[/url]

Comments

  • Falcon1Falcon1 Elite Ranger
    GM can't compete... hmm well stop making stupid "Sports Utility Vehicles" then. Adapt to the market. Can't rely on stupid suv's bringing in the cash.

    Toyota make great cars, very reliable. I just don't find their line up that appealing really. I drove a Corrolla a few years ago and it had a beautiful spring loaded gearbox, changing gear was effortless really, could almost do it with a finger. Just didn't like the styling of it. If I was back on the farm I'd have a Landcruiser though, superb jeep, great work horse and a proper off roader unlike most wannabe 4x4's out there today.
  • If god was to a give a gift to man, then it would be a Corolla.
  • CiberCiber Earthforce Officer
    i dont get it, how toyota can make that really realiable car (run electronically) and still be cheap? what is gm not doing that toyota is?
  • Random ChaosRandom Chaos Actually Carefully-selected Order in disguise
    GM is burdened by (a) pension plans they have to support and (b) entrenched union rules that can't easily adapt to changing competition and market.
  • FreejackFreejack Jake the Not-so-Wise
    Not to mention an overly diverse product line that is made up of large number of brands, whereas Toyota has three primary brands to manage, Toyota, Scion and Lexus.

    I will have to say that GM's build quality as of late is on par with many of the Toyotas I've driven. The Impala I drove as a rental a couple months ago was very nice...

    Jake
  • Space GhostSpace Ghost Elite Ranger
    I drive a GM (a Chevy Cobalt, if anyone is curious) and it runs just fine for me after 10 months. The 100,000 mile warranty was a big selling point so I don't really have anything to worry about until then. I'm of the opinion if you take care of your car, it'll run just fine. I drove 3 GM cars before this one and each was either close to or over 10 years old. I didn't really have any major problems with those either.
  • BigglesBiggles <font color=#AAFFAA>The Man Without a Face</font>
    Yours may be fine, but I bet if you searched the net a little, you'd find heaps of people who have had no end of problems with there one and thus concluding that all GM cars are crap.

    Cars are just like hard drives. :)
  • Our Toyota has hit 250,000 miles not too long ago (and I missed it dammit!) still runs great. And its about 17.5 years old.

    So eat that GM cars.
  • Random ChaosRandom Chaos Actually Carefully-selected Order in disguise
    10 years really isn't a good life for a car. My Toyota is 14 years old now and hasn't had any major failures. A few minor things, like axle barrings and automatic windows have failed, but those are relatively simple to replace.

    It's got about 150,000 miles on it, and should be good for another 100-150 thousand miles.
  • SanfamSanfam I like clocks.
    Freejack, the sheer size of the brands isn't the only problem, either. The biggest issue is more along the lines of piss-poor management. The inability of the company to understand that it does not need every brand to cater to every customer has been a constant stumbling point. It looked like they were on the right track when Maximum Bob took over, but they have been floating back towards a mish-mosh of brands. Why, for the love of all that is holy, would Cadillac need a front wheel drive "base model?" Why did Pontiac need a minivan? (or anybody else other than Chevy, for that matter...remember those? Same product, only change is the grille) Why did Saab need a Trailblazer-based SUV? And they're doing it again. Pontiac just got the G5, a cobalt-based vehicle whose only variation is the grille and is sold in the same market. They're doing it with the new lambda-based crossovers. Saturn and Buick both received vastly differentiated products, with the Buick Enclave having a substantially more luxurious feature set and look. Even the GMC Acadia could almost be warranted. But why do they need a Chevrolet version, or a possible Pontiac version? Or if the rumors are true, a Cadillac version? Platform sharing is one thing, but blatant rebadging and overproduction is just terrible. I mean, come on. They've got Chevrolet, Pontiac, Buick, Cadillac, Saturn, Saab, GMC, Daewoo, and ties with a couple other japanese brands (Suzuki, for example). Even with this portfolio, they could easily product a product lineup that would work but have completely failed to do so.


    Another issue is the [B]perceived[/B] quality of GM cars. While their cars were not all that unreliable and (generally speaking) would last as long as any Toyota, Honda, or other import brand, the fit and finish of the overall machine was fairly poor in comparison. The interiors were always cheap and used substandard materials or were simply designed by someone with no concern for the anatomy of the modern human being. Levers made of plastic that just felt cheap, switches that had poor tactile feedback. Every little bit adds up, and each is a less than obvious point off the perception of quality (even if it never breaks). When it comes to cars, excluding the outright poorly designed models (which do exist in all brands) or those occasional bad powertrains (GM's diesels in the 80's, the old four cylinders)

    And one last issue (not GM specific): Overpricing cars with the intention of offering incentives. It's apparently an American tradition, but offering incentives on a car destroys its resale value and makes it much less appealing overall.

    There's a lot wrong with GM. Pension is just one part of it.

    Oh, one last addition: Now GM is playing the consumer for its own poor management by indefinitely holding its numerous rear wheel drive projects on the grounds of unjust and unfair EPA requirements. This is just ludicrous and only serves to lower their reputation in the eyes of those who actually see the problems. It's just another cheap move in a long line of stupid decisions that undermines what remains of the consumer's confidence and throws away their chance to offer products people actually want. the Pontiac G8 was revealed to the American public only recently and received nothing but praise! It is exactly what is wanted and would revitalize the brand, and make it unique as would a RWD Chevrolet Caprice and Chevrolet Impala. Gah.
  • FreejackFreejack Jake the Not-so-Wise
    Sanfam, you hit it right on the head...cross platforming is not necessarily a bad thing, as long as you strive to make each vehicle unique, the Chrysler 300 and the Dodge Charger are good examples, same platfrom, both very different vehicles. Of course Chrysler is also guilty to rebadging that damages the brand :cough:Jeep Compass:cough:

    You forgot to add Holden, Opel and Vauxhaul to the product lines....

    I will say the the [URL="http://www.gmc.com/acadia/acadia/index.jsp"]Acadia[/URL] is one of the best looking crossovers I've seen yet.

    Jake
  • croxiscroxis I am the walrus
    I should add that the car Seafroggy is talking about is from 1990 and can still pull 40 mpg on the freeway :)
  • Vorlons in my HeadVorlons in my Head The Vorlons told me to.
    One problem I've noticed with GM has had for close to eternity (with some exceptions) is completely bland to downright terrible styling both outside and inside. Most of them are cars people simply don't want to see themselves cought dead driving. I swear the design of most GM cars is based around senior citizens. I know all brands come out with poor design but GM strives for excellence in that category.

    For now my Subaru Impreza is 4 1/2 years old and I've already managed to rack up 120,000 miles on it with no problems other than expected wear itmes such as one worn out clutch and axle bearings. Never left me on the side of the road. My next car will very likely be another Subaru.
  • Falcon1Falcon1 Elite Ranger
    The funny thing I find with the Saab 93 is that its basically a Vauxhall Vectra but with a large price tag.

    I think its sad in a way that badge means nothing these days. Especially the way different brand engines end up in cars. Doesn't really matter if its a VAG group engine being shared in an Audi S3/Seat Cupra/Golf R32. But when lets say your buying a Mini Cooper and it has a GM engine in, I would not like that. If I was buying one I'd like a BMW engine thank you very much.

    What I don't get about american car designers is why their designs seem so half assed. The exteriors on some are ok but why do they drop the ball with the interior? Top Gear had that crap pile the Cadillac Escalade when it came out. Inside it was like a cheap plastic toy car. And they expected people to fork out £40-50k on it, despite it costing $25k in the US. They also had what I think was similar to the new CTS-V and it had shocking breaks and suspension. Richard Hammond basically said after spending £25k one would need to spend another £2k to make it drive properly. But it had a big engine. And that was about it. The only American cars I'd buy today if I had the cash would be a 60's Dodge Charger and a Ford Mustang. Something with a bit of soul and breeding.

    I also find it amusing Ford are in trouble. Despite that almost every second car on the roads here is a dull Focus or a Mondeo, they are still bleeding money. And despite owning Jaguar they couldn't do anything with them. Hmm lets take some bits from a Mondeo and stick em in an XJ. Wow that won't effect sales and no one will notice. Makes you wonder how Audi can buy Lamborghini and do wonders and VW take Bentley and make them even better. I suppose since Ford are like Dell in a way and live on razor tight margins, then any ups or downs will hurt them.

    Cars eh :)
  • Falcon1Falcon1 Elite Ranger
    Vorlons is that a 2.0T you got? I'd love one of those but the servicing costs would kill me.

    My 2.0 Golf GTi is a 95, just done 70k miles and averages 35mpg. Nowhere near as impressive performance wise of the new Mk5 GTi's but I don't have £19k spare for one... yet :D
  • Vorlons in my HeadVorlons in my Head The Vorlons told me to.
    No I got the 2.5RS. Mine is 2002 which was the first year the 2.0T WRX's actually made it to the US market. The WRX was still quite a bit more expensive and I was a little more concerned about potential maintenance issues with the turbo model being new here and knowing I'd have to drive the hell out of it. All things considered I'm glad I went with the 2.5RS. With fuel prices constantly going up I'd be screwed since the 2.0T requires premium gas.
    Hows the VW been for you? My previous cars were actually a 93 VW Corrado and a 96 Jetta, both with the 2.8L V6 but those turned out to be maintenance nightmares. Towards the end they spent about one day in the shop for every day on the road, and thats not a joke.
  • Falcon1Falcon1 Elite Ranger
    Yeah the turbo's require regular services to keep em right. The top of the line one has to be serviced every 4k miles. But it is tuned to the nuts, something 475bhp and can keep up with a Lamborghini Murcielago. A friend of mine has a 2yr old WRX and its insanely fast.

    Touch wood my Golf has been great! Its only the 8v 115bhp model but it pulls really well. Its not quick off the line but the top end is good. I've had it 3 years now, got it with 64k on the clock and as I said its just done 70k. It had one lady owner before me and she kept it spotless. Shines up superbly as well. Thats a shame yours were sick alot. It depends I suppose, sometimes you get a lemon and everything goes wrong. I would love a Corrado VR6 Storm 2.9lt along with a Golf VR6 2.8lt. Put an induction kit on them and listen to the roar... :P Something else :) I do know some of the early VR6 engines had issues (around the 93 year) but these were sorted in later models.

    Before the GTi I had my parents old MK3 1.9 diesel Golf. Was a real work horse, slow but good. It did up to 119k miles before the syncromesh started wearing on the gearbox so I shifted it before it required a new one. Apart from that it was trouble free. Never even had its original clutch replaced! :)
  • SanfamSanfam I like clocks.
    Top Gear shouldn't be considered a great source on the matter of quality. Clarkson seems to hate anything American, even if it doesn't actually deserve it, and sometimes even if he owns it. :p

    And the Hamster is weird at times.

    Anyway, the problem with ford is that they seem to be just *slightly* behind the curve. They're doing better than GM, though, and potentially superior product portfolio. They just need to stop fucking around with Lincoln and Mercury and make something out of the two brands (Say...Mercury the Eurokiller and Lincoln, the pinnacle of American Luxury?). Mazda is fucking fantastic and is owning the competition. Jaguar is an enormous burden on their end, though. It needs a major shock to get it on track and it's probably not something that can be done in a reasonable amount of time. Volvo is doing amazingly well and is looking up in every single sector. The rest of the PAG is iffy, but still decent. It's much better differentiated than GM's product portfolio. What Ford needs more than anything else is a good line of modern compacts. The focus is too little car for too much money, and that's all they've got.

    Freejack, I agree...the Acadia is beautiful. But the outlook is also fairly nice. But when it comes to crossovers, I've always been partial to the Freestyle/Taurus X. But hoo man, they won my oldschool Volvo cred back with the Flex :D Too bad the third row is not removable :(

    Also, freejack...GM is finally doing something right with Saturn. They're becoming the new US brand for Opel's products, and it is looking great. The craptacular Saturn Ion is being phased out and replaced with a much more interesting Astra. The Vue is now mechanically identical to the Antara, with the Aura being another great model. The Relay sucks, but it is being replaced by the much better Outlook. And the Sky (mmm...Redline) is glorious in every possible way.

    Anyway, I foresee GM continuing to struggle, with Ford potentially picking up the slack. DCX is looking to be very confused right now, too. Jeep was just abruptly watered down this last year and infused with completely useless products, and Chrysler/Dodge are risking the sharing of unnecessary vehicles (Chrysler Aspen, for example). Hopefully they can see their error before it gets too far. the LX cars are just so damned near perfect.

    And Falcon, don't consider the Escalade an actual product. It's just a way of GM raking in a pile of money before it blows away.

    As far as the WRX goes, my roommate loves his 2004 wagon. mmm...go-juice. Now that it is out of warranty, he's looking into tuning it just a wee bit. You know, a couple digits here and there. And also there...mmm.
  • Vorlons in my HeadVorlons in my Head The Vorlons told me to.
    Not exactly sure but I'm pretty sure the 93 Corrado and Jetta shared exactly the same engine since the 96 models and engines were was mostly unchanged since 1993 when the new styling came out. They sure as hell suffered the exact engine problems as well as the same cooling and electrical issues. They both suffered from serious overheating problems which was the root of a lot of the problems. Also a lot of stupid problems such as failed sensors which led to some very serious ones like the car not registering the engine was overheating until the car started going bad. Lol, Im sure yours has it as well but the V6's have a coolant bubble tank towards the back of the engine. Each one burst that tank at least 4 times. Its obviously a car that was designed for cooler climates and did not perform very well in all year round tropical heat. The Corrado's in particular had the stock radiator fans replaced at the dealer for more powerfull dual fan units.
  • Falcon1Falcon1 Elite Ranger
    Yeah it is true Clarkson can be a bit anti-american ;) Well a bit is just the tip of the iceberg. Thing is he has a Ford GT40 which I actually like the shape of. And it keeps breaking down on him. Hee and he just makes excuses for it :)

    Hamster rules! Hes funny and he survived that horrific crash! And he did not get his teeth whitened :p

    The Escalade is popular with premiership footballers over here. Says it all really.

    The Mazda RX-8 is a cool car. Also the Mazda 6 MPS is interesting, nice styling and pretty quick too! I just hate their adverts... ZOOM ZOOM!! AAAAAAH STOP IT!!! :D

    Jaguar needs cash to come up with new engines and a whole new strategy. And Ford can't deliver there.

    Now there is one car that the GM makes which kicks major ass. And thats the Vauxhall/Holden Monaro! A proper muscle care with proper performance. I loved it on Top Gear when they had it on the beach... it had so much power going to the rear wheels it dug itself into the sand! :D If I had the cash I'd get one for sure!
  • Falcon1Falcon1 Elite Ranger
    Yeah they would have shared the same engine. I know a few people who've had a wide range of Golf's and Corrado's and I remember discussions about the first run VR6 engines not being quite 100%. General recommendations were to find a later model, preferably a 1997 one. Of course that applies only to the Golf and not the Corrado. Such a shame they killed it. Was a car before its time really.

    Sensors do seem to bit twitchy on VW's. Seen lots of comments on various forums/user groups about em. Some are so bad, you take the car to a VW dealership, they plug in their magic box laptops and report no faults. Because the sensors report back as normal! WTF??!! I would agree they were not designed for hot climates. My old golf used to heat up something terrible on a real hot day (thats 25 degress c here), even worse stuck in traffic.
  • SanfamSanfam I like clocks.
    Falcon1, like I said...even though he owns one, he still quietly unfairly hates the rest. his complaints about the CTS-V, for example, were basically comparing it to cars costing twice as much (if not more). And his roadtrip through the south showed exactly what he thought of this country. But he does (quietly) love the GT40. And the breaking down, as far as can be determined, is due to his absurd levels of abuse. (which he even mentions occasionally) :p

    Not to say I don't love Top Gear. It's the best damned car program on the tube.

    VWs and Audis. Two cars I will likely never own, which sucks for me. They're beautifully designed, have fun engines, and typically handle like go-karts. Plus, I've got a liking for the oil burners of the world. More brands need those torquey little diesels in their lineup.
  • Don't get me started on cars...my last car was a 95 Citroen XM Turbo Exclusive, really comfortable big car leather seats and all, but the electrics were a stuff of nightmares. If the A/C unit didn't come on, your headlights didn't work.

    I now have a 1995 metallic green VW Passat, the one with the 2.8 litre VR6 engine.
  • SpiritOneSpiritOne Magneto ABQ NM
    The thing Toyota has quietly feared yet wanted for 50 years finally happened.

    To whoever said Ford was doing better, I think your wrong. Last I read Ford was in a worse financial position that GM. They have been up and down on projects desperately trying to find a profit somewhere. The short lived GT40 is now no longer being produced. They finally figured out people were laughing at their 500 as a blatant rip of the Chrysler 300, so they are rebadging it the Taurus and bringing back the failed Freestyle as the TaurusX.

    The F series pickups have been losing ground in the public sector for years, if not for their base offering and their huge commercial contracts the F series would no longer be the #1 pickup in America.

    All that being said, my wife wants a Ford Edge as her next vehicle. Its a crossover SUV that shares its platform with that Mazda SUV. Its kind of pitiful in the power department, but its roomy inside and more comfortable than I expected (we test drove one a week or so a go).

    GM is just a mish mash of the same vehicle with a different front end. Nothing spectacular going on over there. Everyone else has pretty much hit the nail on the head with them.

    As far as Toyota's go, I don't really like them. Some of them look like decent cars, but they can be quite expensive compared to another manufacturer. No built in rebates keeps the value up, but WTF? To buy their new Tundra with comparable specs as my Titan would cost upwards of $45k. Thats almost 15k more than what I paid for my truck. No way. I had an annoying experience in a Toyota Camry too once, I got it as a rental in El Paso. I was leaving the airport and it started beeping at me, a loud repeating ping that would not go away. I'm looking all over the dash trying to figure out what the problem is. I undo my seatbelt and reconnect it to check that sensor. It wont go away, solid beeping. Just as I am about to take it back I lean over and see a light pointed at the passenger seat blinking wildly. I set my laptop bag in the damn passenger seat. I am the driver. I tell the car what to do and how to do it. I don't like cars that think otherwise.
Sign In or Register to comment.