Issues with your account? Bug us in the Discord!

New Line Vs Peter Jackson, Rd 2

Entil'ZhaEntil'Zha I see famous people
[url]http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/index.php?id=39462[/url]

Shaye: New Line Blacklists Jackson

In the latest comment in the controversy surrounding a proposed movie based on J.R.R. Tolkien's The Hobbit, New Line head Robert Shaye told SCI FI Wire in no uncertain terms that the studio won't work with Lord of the Rings director Peter Jackson on that film or any other film. Ever. At least not as long as Shaye is in charge.

Comments

  • Falcon1Falcon1 Elite Ranger
    Well they could always boot Shaye out :)

    Serious bad blood now it seems.
  • BigglesBiggles <font color=#AAFFAA>The Man Without a Face</font>
    Can you blame them? How would you feel if someone you hired then started complaining about your dodgy accounting practices and attempts to prevent him getting all the money he was contractually expected to receive?
  • Space GhostSpace Ghost Elite Ranger
    Yes, how dare he demands the money he is owed. It makes me so happy when big business isn't held accountable. After all, they are much better than us regular people, and they always know what's best.
  • FreejackFreejack Jake the Not-so-Wise
    His comments are childish for a person who is supposed to be the head of a company that brings in a couple billion in revenue annually.

    That said, I believe Shaye is one of New Line's founders, so there its unlikely he'll be out any time soon.

    Jake
  • ShadowDancerShadowDancer When I say, "Why aye, gadgie," in my heart I say, "Och aye, laddie." London, UK
    [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Freejack [/i]
    [B]That said, I believe Shaye is one of New Line's founders, so there its unlikely he'll be out any time soon.[/B][/QUOTE]

    thats what good old fashioned mail bombs are for. :p

    seriously tho, if it is essentially a breach of contract on their part then jackson should be able to sue them successfully for the money, and i hope he does. it sounds like new line deserve it
  • Entil'ZhaEntil'Zha I see famous people
    Now lets just hope that someone can hold up New Line's production of The Hobbit until they lose the rights.
  • croxiscroxis I am the walrus
    I'm sure there may be some fans that work there who can hold it up in committee or pull out every nitpicking law they have to follow and fix before they can start production.

    "What do you mean we all have to have food handling licenses? I don't even serve the food"
    "But sir, you do make your own lunch."
  • MessiahMessiah Failed Experiment
    Well this has convinced me that they are indeed holding back money from Peter Jackson, I mean its almost like he flat out says it.
  • BigglesBiggles <font color=#AAFFAA>The Man Without a Face</font>
    Yeah. His argument that Peter Jackson shouldn't be expecting more because he's already received $X is pretty absurd.

    [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Entil'Zha [/i]
    [B]Now lets just hope that someone can hold up New Line's production of The Hobbit until they lose the rights. [/B][/QUOTE]

    Since MGM has distribution rights (as I recall), they can probably hold it up quite effectively if they want to.
  • Entil'ZhaEntil'Zha I see famous people
    I was thinking the same thing, Sure, you CAN make the argument that if you've already made a quarter of a billion dollars on something, it may be petty to argue ofer a piddly $50,000,000.

    but anyone who makes that argument should be kicked in the head.. ONLY $50,000,000... that he is entitled to.... madness.

    And yes MGM has the rights, and has publicly stated that they want Peter Jackson to direct.

    Also i found it interesting that in the article it's mentioned that many of the LOTR actors want nothing to do with New Line. which i think will end up Hurting New Line in the long run.
  • there was an article about it in empire magazine this month (the one with Optimus Prme on the cover hehe)

    see WB owns New Line and they COULD lean on them to get over themseleves, the reasons for this are a) many (in fact all irrc) of the original Rings actors have said they will not do another film without jackson (so no Sir Ian as Gandalf or Ian Holm as bilbo) and b) very few directors would WANT to take it on because of the extremly large (pardon the expression) shadow PJ cass over the franchise, plus if weta cant do the FX it pretty much only leaves ILM who cost more

    however what goes against this is WB do not want to set precedent where every director will be able to get them to declare thier exact accounts (see directors getting screwed is nothing new, infac its the norm, the way the studio sort out the money is kept deliberatyly vauge to make sure the execs get the biggest slice of the pie)
  • MessiahMessiah Failed Experiment
    [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Biggles [/i]
    [B]Since MGM has distribution rights (as I recall), they can probably hold it up quite effectively if they want to. [/B][/QUOTE]

    The problem is that they only have to start producing, to keep it. They dont have to sell anything..
  • Entil'ZhaEntil'Zha I see famous people
    And now for round 3

    PJ's Reply.


    [url]http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/index.php?id=39469[/url]
    Jackson RespondsTo Shaye

    Lord of the Rings director Peter Jackson released a statement saying that he found "regrettable" comments made by New Line Cinema chief Robert Shaye to SCI FI Wire that Jackson would never work for the studio again under his watch.

    In an interview, Shaye—New Line's chief executive officer—told SCI FI Wire, "I do not want to make a movie with somebody who is suing me," referring to Jackson and his legal action concerning accounting practices for Jackson's Lord of the Rings films. "It will never happen during my watch."

    Jackson's complete statement follows:

    "Our issue with New Line Cinema has only ever been about their refusal to account for financial anomalies that surfaced from a partial audit of The Fellowship of the Ring. Contrary to recent comments made by Bob Shaye, we attempted to discuss the issues raised by the Fellowship audit with New Line for over a year, but the studio was and continues to be completely uncooperative. This has compelled us to file a lawsuit to pursue our contractual rights under the law. Nobody likes taking legal action, but the studio left us with no alternative.

    "For over two years, New Line has denied us the ability to audit The Two Towers and The Return of the King, despite repeated requests. Film auditing is a common and straightforward practice within the industry, and we don't understand why New Line Cinema has taken this position.

    "In light of these circumstances, I didn't think it was appropriate for me to be involved in New Line Cinema's 40th-anniversary video. I have never discussed this video with any of the cast of The Lord of the Rings. The issues that Bob Shaye has with the cast pre-date this lawsuit by many years.

    "Fundamentally, our legal action is about holding New Line to its contractual obligations and promises. It is regrettable that Bob has chosen to make it personal. I have always had the highest respect and affection for Bob and other senior management at New Line and continue to do so." —Patrick Lee, News Editor
  • What is film auditing?
  • croxiscroxis I am the walrus
    prolly the same as any other business auditing
  • MessiahMessiah Failed Experiment
    [URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auditing]Auditing[/URL].

    (I didnt know either..
Sign In or Register to comment.