Issues with your account? Bug us in the Discord!
Decent web page editing software?
Freejack
Jake the Not-so-Wise
in Zocalo v2.0
OK here's the situation, at work, I am responsable for the maintenence of a for a small section of our corporate website. Mainly writing new articles from week to week and posting reports on the sites so the divisions have access to them.
Anyway having a very minimal knowledge of html, I am forced to use FrontPage, since the only other web site development software that the company uses a much more complicated software, I believe is called visual webdav.
At this point I am about ready to kill FrontPage. Its about as useful as teets on a boar hog....
Unfortuately since maintenence of the site is a minor responseblity amoung many others, I do not have the time to sit and learn a major software or html. Does anyone have any recommendations as to a web page editor that is reasonably functional without a huge learning curve?
Thanks
Jake
Anyway having a very minimal knowledge of html, I am forced to use FrontPage, since the only other web site development software that the company uses a much more complicated software, I believe is called visual webdav.
At this point I am about ready to kill FrontPage. Its about as useful as teets on a boar hog....
Unfortuately since maintenence of the site is a minor responseblity amoung many others, I do not have the time to sit and learn a major software or html. Does anyone have any recommendations as to a web page editor that is reasonably functional without a huge learning curve?
Thanks
Jake
Comments
oh well..
try HTML Kit, great program for text editing. (Includes preview window!)
Dreamweaver is like the holy grail of web editors, it's also around $500 i think for a single license.
[B]drat biggles, that was what I was going to say....
oh well..
try HTML Kit, great program for text editing. (Includes preview window!) [/B][/QUOTE]
You're not the only one who was going to say the same thing as Biggles....allthough Dreamweaver is the best!
(Halt the presses! Exile has an informed opinion!)
Wysiwyg's are ok, Dreamweaver being the best of them. I've never had to weed a Dreamweaver built page. You only ever seem to get into trouble when you add too much java or dhtml 'doodads and gizmos'. KISS principile applies.
And yeah, I'm a code monkey... make webpages on stuff for fun, though I'm currently limited to HTML and CSS. Sometime when I find time, I'll get into some XML and DHTML... Java and Flash come this year in Progging class at school. My goal is to master them before we learn them. :D
[Edit]Oh, and that Webmonkey site is excellent. A year ago, I would have considered myself as clueless as Freejack in the area of HTML; I'm a regular geek now. Worked wonders... :)
[B]
And yeah, I'm a code monkey...
[Edit]Oh, and that Webmonkey site is excellent. [/B][/QUOTE]
My my, there are a lot of monkeys around here! ;)
But I mostly use [url=http://www.code-genie.com/cgenie.html]Code Genie 3[/url] for my HTML work.
and yes... I'm also another Code Sapien...
:p
[B]Notepad. [/B][/QUOTE]
A text editor...but not notepad. Notepad has a character limit.
One of the great things about HTML is that it takes about an hour to learn.
As far as coding the site directly, I'd love to be able to do that, but since this website is only about 10% of my responsibilities I just don't have the time or the mental resources to learn it at the moment.
The thing that drives me nuts about frontpage is the text editing, It just makes no sense, and seems to be inconsistent at best.
Jake
[B]The win2k and winxp ones don't. :)
One of the great things about HTML is that it takes about an hour to learn. [/B][/QUOTE]
Yeah! To learn HTML doesn't tkae that long, but you usually have to learn javascript and other things to make a deacent looking webpage.
[url]http://www.rit.edu/~aas7554/409/[/url]
It may not be great looking, but I think it's good enough, and it's simply a bit of CSS with the proper arrangement and color scheme.
[B]I also like frontpage well enough, for it's cost/features it works very well. It's no more complicated than Word or Excel to use, although it does have a couple of minor quirks.[/B][/QUOTE]
Features like the way it creates hugely bloated HTML code?
[B]Features like the way it creates hugely bloated HTML code? [/B][/QUOTE]
I warned you! But did you listen to me? Oh, no, you knew
it all, didn't you? Oh, it's just a harmless little bunny--errr, I mean... WYSIWYG!
The problem with HTML, like I've said, is that JUST HTML limits you to some pretty basic webpages. Learning CSS, which takes about another hour on Webmonkey, will greatly improve your ability, but for a large site or a very complicated one, you need some more advanced stuff. PHP, Perl, XML, DHTML, C++, QBASIC, I'm just naming random languages now, and Unreal Tournament 2K3's Karma Physics Engine. Or something.
[B]Yes, but when you're just using HTML in frontpage you get far more than is actually needed. [/B][/QUOTE]
I don't know why I quoted you, I kinda quoted Monty Python and then went of on my own rant. Ignore me. :D
:D:D:D
1] it's free.
2] it doesn't throw in abunch of it's own meta code.
3] you can jump between WYSIGWG and the HTML real easy.
4] it's crisp and clean, not a big program, and has a bunch of features.
6] did I mention it's free?
It might be old...but its quite good :)
HTML + a little CSS
[url]www.b5-blender.com[/url]
HTML + a fair amount of CSS....
[url]www.b5-blender.com/index.php[/url]
HTML, CSS, and PHP...muahaha!!!
;)
[B]Helipad
:D:D:D [/B][/QUOTE]
Shag Pad. :D :D