Issues with your account? Bug us in the Discord!
its got a name now
ShadowDancer
When I say, "Why aye, gadgie," in my heart I say, "Och aye, laddie."London, UK
in Zocalo v2.0
[URL=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/5277736.stm]orion[/URL]
i still think that nasa doesnt have what it takes tho. its become form over substance
i still think that nasa doesnt have what it takes tho. its become form over substance
Comments
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by ShadowDancer [/i]
[B][URL=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/5277736.stm]orion[/URL]
i still think that nasa doesnt have what it takes tho. its become form over substance [/B][/QUOTE]
I'm still of the opinion that the best way to launch for mars, is from the ISS or the Moon,
i still can't fathom why its going to take us 14 years to get back to the moon, when it took less than 10 the first time.
Worf
[B]The first thought I had when I saw that picture, is they're building the [URL=http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Phoenix]Phoenix[/URL] .
Worf [/B][/QUOTE]
they've changed the pic now, but yeah i know what u mean.
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Entil'Zha [/i]
[B]i still can't fathom why its going to take us 14 years to get back to the moon, when it took less than 10 the first time. [/B][/QUOTE]
The last time they had Stanley Kubrick. Now all we have is George Lucas and he has to wait for technology to catch up to his vision. :D
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Stingray [/i]
[B]The last time they had Stanley Kubrick. Now all we have is George Lucas and he has to wait for technology to catch up to his vision. :D [/B][/QUOTE]
Yeah and I guess I wasn't the only one to catch the link to 2001 either...
Orion was the name of the PanAm ship coming up from Earth to the rotating space station wasn't it?
And a nice one too... :)
Those server errors are really starting to worry me...
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Stingray [/i]
[B]The last time they had Stanley Kubrick. Now all we have is George Lucas and he has to wait for technology to catch up to his vision. :D [/B][/QUOTE]
Hell, the tech hasn't caught up with Kubrick's(Clarke's) yet!
Jake
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by ShadowDancer [/i]
[B][URL=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/5277736.stm]orion[/URL]
i still think that nasa doesnt have what it takes tho. its become form over substance [/B][/QUOTE]
I actually think that, while the lack of a space plane is not good in the long term (do a search for "ballistic reentry," it's been discussed previously), for simply getting to the moon as cheaply as possible they're closer to the right track now.
[url]http://www.collectspace.com/news/news-081006b.html[/url]
[B]Just Remember, The galaxy is on orion's belt. [/B][/QUOTE]
Hah hah... MIB II wasn't it?
[B]Hah hah... MIB II wasn't it? [/B][/QUOTE]
Nope, it was in the first MIB flick... the second one had the man-eating-cactus-woman-thing in it. :D
Oo, here we go:
[img]http://starbaseatlanta.com/ebaypics/alienssbarpatch.JPG[/img]
And the one donned by Nasa in comparison...
[img]http://www.collectspace.com/images/news-081006c.jpg[/img]
Lower right corner.
Worf
Seriously, the projected cancer rates were very low. I say go for it. Way better than current chemical rockets.