Issues with your account? Bug us in the Discord!

Good News For Most Canadians

1235»

Comments

  • SolitaireSolitaire Moderator
    well ym claims are mainly of an hypothetical nature, I really searched for documentations veryfying your claim, but maybe you can help me there...
  • RhettRhett (Not even a monkey)
    [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Solitaire [/i]
    [B]@ rhett - I haven't enroled exact comparisons but if you don't feel in some way controlled and have full faith in your gouvernment then I really admire you as you surely have a better sleep as I have had since the developments since september 11th.
    and additionally I want to say that a situation discribed at the example of the clarke regime that I was alluding to needn't to be exactly the same in outward appearance and execution to have the same character or result in the future.

    if life and policy would be that easy as the plot in a TV show we haven't had those problems - always concentrate on the backstory! [/B][/QUOTE]

    So I have full faith in my government? Hell no. But the way the government works was set up amazingly well, and it made a takeover by one person practically impossible. I also have faith in the American people. I don't see the government cracking down on liberties, but I would be more than willing to read UNBIASED articles about what is going on in regards to a crackdown on liberties. If you can provide some specific examples of a loss of liberties, let me know.
  • Captain,SimmondsCaptain,Simmonds Trainee trainee
    I should remind you people..... If the US ends up going to war with north Korea, and the Draft is Ativated, You are all welcome to come to Canada. Is'nt it nice to have a almost neutral country north of you, thats not a shit hole like Mexico.:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
  • SolitaireSolitaire Moderator
    as I said most of that what alluding to is of an hypothetical nature and personal commentary regarding small tiles of a possible puzzle.
    when I say that freedom gets questioned in some aspects then I don't mean that you can't mover where you want or say something even against Mr. Bush or someone else but there limitations begin where most ppl don't look at or where it is not that obvious or just becomes out of spot as the attention is focused to other things.
    but you can't put aside that intel all over the world got rid of a lot of civil rights officially hinder them interfere too much in privacy etc without evident suspect. (even in my country as a cause of 11th sep.)
    carnivore is only one example although this might not be any disturbance to you and as you're no antiwar activist I assume you also haven't had contact with authorities.

    well, I think positions pro and contra are that stiffened that I don't think arguing will lead to a result, so I will quit this discussion before the tone gets worse.
    take my posts as another angle and think about it, I'll try to do that as well...
  • mambo_mordenmambo_morden Earthforce Officer
    [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Solitaire [/i]
    [B]well ym claims are mainly of an hypothetical nature, I really searched for documentations veryfying your claim, but maybe you can help me there... [/B][/QUOTE]

    [url]http://www.caabu.org/press/documents/unscr-resolution-678.html[/url]

    [url]http://www.caabu.org/press/documents/unscr-resolution-660.html[/url]

    The UN Resolution that authorized force (UN Resolution 678) ONLY authorized member nations to enforce UN Resolution 660... which DID NOT authorize the neutralization of the Iraqi Government.

    I'm not sure if you can point the failure of the UN to act then on a conspiracy on the part of the US ( this is what it sounded like you were implying... correct me if I am wrong ). The tone at the UN in regards to the Iraqi regime was the same then as now.
Sign In or Register to comment.