Issues with your account? Bug us in the Discord!

Cable connections, wireless LANs, an other stuff...HELP!

ok...here is the deal, I seriously want a cable connection. the thing is, my parents will only get it if I can get it for the same price/cheaper then dialup+dedicated phone line.

well. I can, until they said that since we have three computers, we would need three IP addys, meaning an extra 20$ a month for those two PCs. (Arn't IP addys sold by the YEAR???).

anyhoo, I was thinking connect them up via a LAN to share the one connection. however they way our house is setup, running wires isn't really an option, and I'm not certain if I CAN share the connection. (Do you really need those other IP addys? can they TELL if you don't buy them?).

so, if yes, a network would allow me to share the connection without buying two more IP addys, how good are wireless networks?

the specs:
two PCs running XP Pro, one running XP Home.

the XP Home and one XP Pro are in locations that the cable could be accesed.

so...is it possible to get these three hooked up though a LAN to share one cable connection without buying three IP numbers?

thanks!

------------------
[b]whitestar90: [/b]"it would give the computer a heartattack just looking at it" -
[b]Sanfam: [/b]"And Drazi didn't like it one bit.-
[b]Mr.Bungle: [/b][i]"So that's where the forum went..."[/i]-
---
[b][i]ahhh, the good old days of HTML.[/i][/b]

Comments

  • Rogue TraderRogue Trader Somebody stop him...
    plug the cable into an Airport and have wifi in each of the three computers and you should be fine. but they might not be happy about you splitting the cable, but i say **** the cable company because they are looking to **** you.

    but hey if you dont want to do that you could always pay, just make sure there is vasoline around [img]http://216.15.145.59/mainforums/biggrin.gif[/img]
  • BekennBekenn Sinclair's Duck
    Yep, the airport seems to be the way to go; you can make the XP Pro box a 1:Many NAT server, and everything will be able to use the same IP. However, note that, unless you use some kind of port forwarding on the NAT server, the other two machines won't be able to receive targeted requests. They'll be able to make connections, but not receive them.

    ------------------
    We are here to place President Grenewetzki under arrest!
  • AnlaShokAnlaShok Democrat From Hell
    Just go out and get a router. I'm using a D-Link DI-614+. It was pretty much plug and play. I have four computers on line at any given time and no requirement of additional IP addresses.

    ------------------
    AnlaShok, Captain of the Gray Hand of Fate Squadron
    Sidhe-1
    Wielder of the Big Heavy Hammer of Obvious Truth
    "FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC!"
  • TyvarTyvar Next best thing to a St. Bernard
    Yes, scrouge up the money and get a Router and the cable company wont know you have multiple computers on the connection.
  • I have a linksys wireless access point/router, and the thing works great. Easy web-based setup. You would need wireless cards for the PCs of course, and to configure them for DHCP, which is the default mode anyway.

    Those little routers use PAT so you only need one IP for the entire network, they pay for themselves quickly, espcially when you have..say...5 computers potentially going at once.
  • SanfamSanfam I like clocks.
    I really do love the new D-Link devices. That company has put out some amazing hardware recently!

    Also, check out their wireless router. Cannot remember the model number, but it has both 2.4 and 5.8 GHz support. Quite futureproof. :-)
  • Yeah, until they release 802.11zza, which will be compatible with nothing else but be "really really fast (we really mean really) and more secure!"
  • SanfamSanfam I like clocks.
    I wouldn't worry. There,s 802.11a, 802.11g, and 802.11b. IMHO, g is the best. It's got the strongest signal and the highest speed.
  • For today...

    I'm mildly frustrated (if you can't tell) at the rapid changing of standards that seems to be going on in wireless..too many incompatible techs running around and more seeming to come out all of the time.

    They need to settle on something at that is at least reverse compatible, like the current ethernet standards which seem to have stabilzed at 10/100TX for most of the wiring that goes in.
  • ok, so need the router and three wireless network cards.

    Linksys wireless access point/router...sounds good. [img]http://216.15.145.59/mainforums/smile.gif[/img]

    thanks guys. *Goes to scout prices and confront the parents*

    wish me luck! I'm tired of 56K, and the high speed connection at the collage just made me even more so!

    ------------------
    [b]whitestar90: [/b]"it would give the computer a heartattack just looking at it" -
    [b]Sanfam: [/b]"And Drazi didn't like it one bit.-
    [b]Mr.Bungle: [/b][i]"So that's where the forum went..."[/i]-
    ---
    [b][i]ahhh, the good old days of HTML.[/i][/b]
  • SanfamSanfam I like clocks.
    802.11g *is* backwards compatible with 802.11b. 802.11a is on the 5.8 ghz frequency range.
  • AnlaShokAnlaShok Democrat From Hell
    I'm sorry, I forgot to mention that my D-Link router is wireless and also has 4 ports for standard wired connections as well.

    Watch the Best Buy and Circuit City sales papers. Counting the rebates, our router cost $80, and the wireless card for the laptop was $50.

    Also, the D-Link has built in configurations for playing games on BattleNet, MSN Zone, etc. Very important, as you have to hunt down which ports to open otherwise to play net games.

    And we also saved a ton of money by dumping the second phone line. We pay about $40 a month for our cable internet service, but our phone bill dropped by $80!!

    So there you go, some real numbers for your case.

    ------------------
    AnlaShok, Captain of the Gray Hand of Fate Squadron
    Sidhe-1
    Wielder of the Big Heavy Hammer of Obvious Truth
    "FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC!"
  • BigglesBiggles <font color=#AAFFAA>The Man Without a Face</font>
    D-Link makes some great hardware. I have one of their DSL modems now. It's a wonderful little thing. Very well made, and with a very nice configuration page as well.

    ------------------
    [url="http://www.minbari.co.uk/log12.2263/"]Never eat anything bigger than your own head.[/url]
    "Nonono...Is not [i]Great[/i] Machine. Is...[i]Not[/i]-so-Great Machine. It make good snow cone though." - Zathras
  • Shrug, I like the linksys, the configuration is easy, and the features (espcially under the advanced section) are numerous- DMZ host, which is a must for me, port forwarding, and MAC address based filtering on the wireless connection (cool thing is - it shows you the addresses that have tried to log in)...also has a standard 4 port 10/100 swtich.
Sign In or Register to comment.