Issues with your account? Bug us in the Discord!
SciFi classics anyone?
Stingray
Elite Ranger
in Zocalo v2.0
Since there isn't much on these days in the way of great movies or tv shows, I was thinking about catching up on classic scifi movies. By classic flicks I don't mean the mainstream blockbusters, but more the b-movie category. Usually those that get remakes that totally bomb at the box office. :D
Do you guys have any favorite titles to share (preferably in English, nothing against Godzilla flicks, but my Japanese really sucks)?
Do you guys have any favorite titles to share (preferably in English, nothing against Godzilla flicks, but my Japanese really sucks)?
Comments
Titan AE wasn't too bad, but it didn't get the success it deserved.
Currently revisiting [I]Invasion of the Body Snatchers[/I] (1956 & 1978).
Battle Beyond the Stars, Roger Corman at his bes.. uhh worst
Silent Running, a brilliant (imho) film that makes you want to celebrate Arbor Day.
The Last Starfighter, Enemy Mine, Ice Pirates, and if you are in a fantasy mood, Dragonslayer.
More recent, but you might not have seen it, is Primer.
Managed to survive 40 minutes before turning it off.
cool database, I remembr one in the 70's with underwater pryamids, UFOS and hot girls in tight outfits but i can't remember the title of it now.
Never heard of it. Wasn't that Uwe Boll's first attempt at film making? :D
[QUOTE=PSI-KILLER;186477][url]http://www.filmsandtv.com/genre.php?gs=1970Sci-Fi&pg=2[/url]
cool database, I remembr one in the 70's with underwater pryamids, UFOS and hot girls in tight outfits but i can't remember the title of it now.[/QUOTE]
That's more like it... might be worth doing some research on this just to figure out the title. ;)
I'll check out some of those mentioned. I've seen some of them before, but they might be worth revisiting.
[I]The Black Hole[/I] is one I haven't seen in a long time. Can't remember if it's any good, but then it's a Disney production.
It was basically this fantasy movie with knights from two castles fighting. Then during their war, aliens attack, so they stop their war and take on the invaders instead.
It's not Krull. This was a comedy.
SD: I havent seen the remake, fortunately.
Stingray: The Black Hole is pretty bad from what I remember..
As for The Black Hole, the best thing about it was the score, which was very atmospheric as I recall
And just for grits and shins, watch [i]2010[/i] afterward, if just to see Roy Schneider and the Leonov doing its aero-braking maneuver.
For classic dystopian future sci-fi there is
[i]Logan's Run, the Running Man[/i] or [i]THX1138[/i]
When Messiah mentioned [i]Outlander[/i], I thought he was talking about the '81 Sean Connery movie [URL="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082869/"]Outland[/URL], which was another of the kinda-ok sci-fi that came out after the success of Star Wars.
Hrm, others? Aways fun to go back and watch the original Transformer animated movie. SpaceBalls is worth revisiting too.
Don't forget Buckaroo Banzai!
Jake
The Dark Crystal
Labyrinth
The Neverending Story
Jake
but Labyrinth and Dark Crystal area lways fun to re-watch!
And we just re-watched 2001 and 2010 recently, love those movies.
[URL="http://xkcd.com/657/"]Speaking of which...[/URL] Primer is one of the few movies which managed to have the group I was watching it with break out a whiteboard and start drawing character timelines. It's...complex. Perhaps needlessly so, but it was still fun to try.
[QUOTE=Stingray;186531]I prefer 2010 to 2001. The dialogue and action sequences are a lot richer. 2001 is too deep for its own good, even though it does a great job at translating the vastness of space.[/QUOTE]
Contrary to what some people will likely say, I agree. 2001 is a deep, subversively dark science fiction film, but it's genuinely difficult to take in under any traditional viewing. it's an open-ended Kubrick film with a conclusion left up to the audience. This isn't to say 2001 is anything even remotely bad (nothing of the sort, it's one of my favorite films of all time!), but that for some viewers the pacing is extremely sluggish and the plot developments often shrouded by other (already subtle) actions. I do much prefer 2010, largely because of its narrative style. The pacing is more natural, the crisis back at home feels more urgent. As a film sequence the two work together extremely well, though do so by playing their cards in a completely different way.
The Black Hole is a soft-serious movie brought to cheese by some silly robots. The rough concept is fairly dark, but the plot doesn't feel as serious due to their presence. But the score is still awesome. And it's fun.
I'm also going to push TRON out as a new-classic that commands serious attention. It's nothing truly remarkable, but it just happens to possess the correct mix of ingredients to make a satisfying science fiction movie.
One word used to describe this movie was "dreadful." I'm not sure that's what I am looking for. :D
[QUOTE]More recent, but you might not have seen it, is Primer.[/QUOTE]
Sounds like a homework assignment to me. Correct me if I'm wrong but if a scifi movie becomes too scientific, doesn't it stop being a piece of fiction?
Classic SciFi... : 5 Million Years to Earth, War of the Worlds, The Time Machine, Journey to the Center of the Earth, and When Worlds Collide. I guess you could say Forbidden Planet and The Day the Earth Stood Still also, but I never got into these like the others I listed.
And actually, for some reason I like the recent remake of TDTESS better. Go figure...
[url]http://neuwanstein.fw.hu/primer_timeline.html[/url] (Spoilers!)
[QUOTE=Stingray;186539]One word used to describe this movie was "dreadful." I'm not sure that's what I am looking for. :D[/quote]
That's what makes it such a great movie. You can't get that bad without really trying.
[quote]Sounds like a homework assignment to me. Correct me if I'm wrong but if a scifi movie becomes too scientific, doesn't it stop being a piece of fiction?[/QUOTE]
Well, first of all, I think you are wrong: if the story is not true (and it's not based on a true story) then no matter how many facts are used, it's still fiction.
And secondly, there's not much science in Primer.